There's a
sucker born every minute.
-- P.T. Barnum
|
According to David W. Maurer, writing in 'The
Big Con' (1940),[3]
there was a similar saying amongst con men: "There's a mark born
every minute, and one to trim 'em and one to knock 'em". Here
'trim' means to rip off, and 'knock' means to persuade away from
a scam. The meaning is that there is no shortage of new victims,
nor of con men, nor of honest men.
--
There's_a_sucker_born_every_minute (my bolding)
|
Yes -
I am still around: In fact doing somewhat better since 6 weeks on
megadoses sublingual B12, which is pleasant, for a change, not because I
am cured, since I am not, but to have something which sofar has helped me
feel less miserable for over 6 weeks continuously.
I wrote about it a month ago, and
will do so again - but not now.
Now is the time to sing the genius that is Dr. Esther Crawley, the
paediatric English genius who got
no less
₤ 120.000 from the Linbury
Trust and ₤ 44.000 from the Ashden Trust, all to
investigate ethically, morally, scientifically and as a genius whether
children ill with ME should be taught that they are merely doing ME (dûing ME, Phil Parker wants the world to say), because they have
the
dysfunctional belief that they are in pain and are ill - which
cannot be so, Phil
Parker and dr. Esther Crawley,
the famous paediatrician, who is the truest of true
geniuses both insist: These children merely
dû
ME - in Phil's very own immortal terms - and merely
thought themselves ill. (See
P.S. for
dûing
ME.)
How do I know this must be so?
Since I
have over 32 years of dysfunctional beliefs, in which I did all the
studies necessary to end with the best possible M.A. in psychology, I
must be very careful, in what I say about psychological subjects. And while it is also
- gasp! - true that I do
have a very high IQ, one must be very careful in what one attributes or
lets others attribute to
oneself, especially when dealing with - gasp! -
true
genius, of the Esther Crawley quality,
unadulterated, pure, honest, true:
Hypatia
was a genius;
madame Curie
was a genius;
Emmy Noether
was a genius; and
dr. Esther
Crawley is a genius
too. Really!
"Would I lie-ie-ie-ie to you?" .......
Would I lie to you?
Would I lie to you honey?
Now would I say something that
wasn't true?
I'm asking you sugar
Would I lie-ie-ie-ie to you?
(Eurythmics)
As little as Phil Parker would lie to
anyone - I tell you forsooth, yea verily - for He says so on His own
site, under His own name, under His own picture, if writing in the third
person about Himself, because He is such a humble, honest man - which
also forces me to put the key part of his vision bold red:
Vision
His core principal [sic] is that
people
are geniuses with amazing skills, qualities and talents, and he
hopes he can help as many people as possible to find that out about
themselves. You can get Phil's latest thoughts, self-help tools and
videos for free from his podcast, blog, twitter and Facebook sites.
[sic]: Personally, I know how to spell,
but I suppose this is a new genius spelling of the genius among
geniuses, Phil Parker. (See P.S.)
See?! Clearly, Phil Parker must be a genius, or else he wouldn't
say so.
That's how I know dr. Esther Crawley also is a genius, which is why she is going to investigate
honestly and scientifically - truly! honestly! - whether children should
be taught to tell the world that they feel better if they feel ill, for
this, so dr. Esther Crawley holds - and she is a genius
paediatrician - is how one cures ill children:
Make them
tell the world
that they only thought themselves ill,
while having everybody on. And
dr.Esther Crawley is a genius.
You know this because
Phil Parker, the
Stalin of the
Phil Parker Group -
"Our core principle is that people are geniuses (..)" - who like
Stalin must be a genius among geniuses, told you and me and the
world: People are geniuses. Thus, Phil Parker must be a genius among
geniuses. Therefore dr. Benor - the
Creator of Whee - is a genius. Therefore
Ms.
Jacquie Footman BA(Hons) PGCE EFTCert-I, MNCP
MAAMET EFT & NLP Practitioner AAMET EFT Trainer EMDR, WHEE,
EmoTrance and Reiki is a major genius (if you didn't know this
already from the length, weight, and genius-quality of her titles). And
clearly dr. Esther Crawley must be a paediatrician genius,
oxonbridge-educated, Parker-validated.
Happily - aren't we all equivalent? You, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Galileo,
Newton, Einstein, Dr. Crawley, Phil Parker, Joseph Goebbels, Simon
Wessely ...
geniuses all - there are in our fine English democracy more geniuses:
There is, for example, Mrs. Joan Kirkbride, the Head of Operations
of the British National Research Ethics Service: She is a genius,
as are all the members of the Ethics Committee, who think it is most
ethical to render the children unto Phil and Esther, to find out
experimentally whether medical experiments on children...
click picture for background info
...make sense: OF COURSE they do: Dr. Esther Crawley,
genius AND The
British National Research Ethics Service - Head of Operations:
Ms. Joan
Kirkbride, genius- say so.
"Would they lie-ie-ie-ie to you?"
Let's experiment on children! In their
own interest!
Really! LP only costs 800 pounds a throw! The worst that
can happen is that it'll make you ill for decades:
Don't be a wimp, don't dû
ME -
try LP: A mere
800 pounds + VAT to teach your children to behave properly and healthily!
P.S. What about the genius among geniuses - his
"core principal"! - very own thought of superlative genius of the word
and concept of "dûing
ME etc"?
Here is Phil Parker, genius among geniuses,
in his very
own words:
When listening to people talking about the problems
in their lives you can often hear what I call ‘passive statements’.
“I am stressed by the state of the economy” is a
good example of this; it’s ‘passive’ because there’s not much they
can do about their stress until the economy improves or time passes.
So in effect they seem to be left powerless by circumstances that
are beyond their control, and there is a sense of being stuck with
the problem.
(..)
There just didn’t seem to be an easy way of doing
this using existing words, so I decided to create a new word to
describe this change.
Let me give an example;
To change ‘I am stressed’ from a passive to an
active, we need to use the new word
‘dûing.’
The word ‘dûing’ comes from the new verb dû (dô, dôes, dîd).
(...)
So I am stressed
becomes
I am dûing stress
See?! By a mere simple addition to the English language me,
Orwell's Winston, and Phil's trainees
are put in our places: Wimpy dûers,
who just don't want to admit that, in the best traditions of prof Wessely
of King's College, London, whoever thinks he has ME only
hûs it as he
dûs it himself (or herself, of course).
Now while it is true that professor
Wessely arrived there before Phil Parker, it is also true that
Phil Parker might have thought it all up himself, as a genius. Great
minds think alike, don'tcha know?!
Thus also we can see that the children in the above picture were clearly
"dûing
stress",
"because there’s not much they can do about their stress"
as they were systematically burned by dr. Mengele - colleague of dr.
Crawley - without having any say in it, as they were all very well
aware.
But still they were - stupidly, one assumes, with Phil - "dûing
stress", living in times that were not yet quite ripe for the
arisal of professor Wessely, dr. Crawley, and
the genius among geniuses Phil
Parker (DO Dip E Hyp P NLP MBIH Certified Master Practitioner of NLP: no
less:
too much of a genius for a university education, it seems).
Finally... readers: One must always realize that, faced with supreme
genius, many want to deny it, pooh pooh it, neglect it, or persecute it:
Socrates was poisoned; Bruno was burned; and Galileo was threatened with
torture.
And there are even people who don't take Phil Parker, Simon Wessely and
Esther Crawley serious, proof positive as that must be that they are
dûing
the wrong thing. But in the interest of completeneness and balance, here
is
However... you should keep in mind reading the above three links that their
authors, like yours truly, cannot possibly be geniuses, in the
sense that Phil Parker, Dr. Esther Crawley, Simon Wessely MD BSc, and
Mrs. Joan Kirkbride are clearly geniuses all.
Don't be too harsh on these benighted
dûers
who have - as yet: there's hope for all, as long as there's life - not
had their dysfunctional beliefs cleansed by the Lightning Process or the
approximately equivalent NICE Process (of professors Wessely, White
and Sharpe), and who may be wondering whether it is not crapulant
fraudulence, in their benightedness:
And as for me + ME: PLEASE DR. CRAWLEY....
PLEASE don't just
dû
things: Convince the world and
convince the British medical world, as you
convinced the ethical geniuses headed by
your fellow genius mrs. Kirkbride that
Britain has a new Isaac Newton, and his name is Phil Parker!
You owe it to the world, you owe it to Phil and you owe it to evidence
based medicine:
miracles do (not just:
dû)
exist, and Phil Parker's Process manufactures them in just three days, by
the thousands, and cures almost any disease.
Would I lie to you?
Would I lie to you honey?
Now would I say something that
wasn't true?
I'm asking you sugar
Would I lie-ie-ie-ie to you?
|
